On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 01:44:44PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 14 August 2013 11:33, Russell King - ARM Linux
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:04:08PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
quoted
Hacked diff is below. Can I write that up as clean patch and submit it,
or do we need a test on real hardware ?
Well, if we want to ensure that it is really correct, the sensible thing
to do is to try it on real hardware, otherwise we're risking yet another
change to this.
Earlier in this thread, some people said that they have the hardware, so
it shouldn't be that difficult to get it tested on real stuff.
Yes, I definitely think we should test on the hardware before we
land yet another change to this PCI code that hasn't really been
thoroughly tested on anything. I have the board/backplane on my
desk but it'll be later in the week before I can do the testing
(currently still messing with uboot config to get it to actually
boot a kernel).
Realview or Versatile? I still need to sort out Realview.
The alternative is - I have both the Realview EB and Versatile PB926
here, but no backplane (it wasn't deemed to be necessary for me to
have such a thing.) If someone wants to donate a backplane...