[PATCH v2 20/31] arm64: User access library function
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
Date: 2012-09-06 08:37:05
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 10:05:34PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 10:01:37PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:quoted
There are indeed a few KB gain in code size but that's probably coming from the exception table since otherwise you just replace a bl with ldrt. It depends on what the compiler does as well, the arm code has some carefully chosen registers when calling the __get_user_x function.It's more than that - it's not just the ldr but also a zeroing of a temporary register to hold the error code should the instruction fault. So it's not only the exception tables but also an increase in the main path - and that's where you benefit from having it out of line and thereby a hotter i-cache.
On 32-bit we have __get_user() inline and get_user() out of line. What was the history behind this?
quoted
If you do the access_ok inline and the __get_user_x separately, the size increase is even greater (at least in the arm64 case it can get to over 20KB). I think x86 does the access_ok check out of line.Please talk to Will about get_user() and put_user(). Afterwards you will definitely want to keep them out of line on 64-bit ARM.
As I said, I already made the change to always inline get_user/put_user with some penalty in the Image size but it makes the code cleaner. I'm not entirely convinced of the performance gain/loss especially on ARMv8 cores with physically tagged caches. There is room for optimisation when I get real silicon. -- Catalin