Thread (170 messages) 170 messages, 19 authors, 2012-09-16

[PATCH v2 14/31] arm64: DMA mapping API

From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
Date: 2012-08-21 13:06:21
Also in: linux-arch, lkml

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 01:40:06AM +0100, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 06:52:15PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
quoted
+static inline struct dma_map_ops *get_dma_ops(struct device *dev)
+{
+	if (unlikely(!dev) || !dev->archdata.dma_ops)
+		return dma_ops;
+	else
+		return dev->archdata.dma_ops;
+}
Does it make sense to add the concept of a global dma ops on arm64,
instead of requiring the dma ops pointer per device similar to how
some other platforms do it (including powerpc)? For devices that lack
archdata.dma_ops, dma_supported() should return 0 (and the other ops
should return error).
If the device doesn't have archdata.dma_ops we return the default
implementation which is currently based on swiotlb. Do you mean that
this shouldn't be the case and just let the device always set
archdata.dma_ops?

-- 
Catalin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help