On Monday 20 August 2012, Catalin Marinas wrote:

quoted

quoted

--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/proc-syms.c

...

quoted

quoted

+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpuc_flush_kern_all);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpuc_flush_user_all);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpuc_flush_user_range);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpuc_coherent_kern_range);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpuc_flush_dcache_area);

See comment on other email about putting function pointers in a struct
instead.

There is no need to support multiple CPU architectures with different
implementations, so allowing these functions to be called without
indirection is better.

What is the __cpuc prefix about then? Could you just drop it?

	Arnd