Thread (170 messages) read the whole thread 170 messages, 19 authors, 2012-09-16

[PATCH v2 08/31] arm64: CPU support

From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
Date: 2012-08-21 09:51:29
Also in: linux-arch, lkml

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:47:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday 20 August 2012, Catalin Marinas wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/proc-syms.c
...
quoted
quoted
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpuc_flush_kern_all);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpuc_flush_user_all);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpuc_flush_user_range);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpuc_coherent_kern_range);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpuc_flush_dcache_area);
See comment on other email about putting function pointers in a struct
instead.
There is no need to support multiple CPU architectures with different
implementations, so allowing these functions to be called without
indirection is better.
What is the __cpuc prefix about then? Could you just drop it?
It can be dropped indeed.

-- 
Catalin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help