Thread (50 messages) 50 messages, 3 authors, 2012-06-15
STALE5125d

[PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: handle additional timings

From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
Date: 2012-06-14 12:29:31
Also in: linux-omap

* Mohammed, Afzal [off-list ref] [120614 05:00]:
Hi Tony,

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 17:22:08, Tony Lindgren wrote:
quoted
* Mohammed, Afzal [off-list ref] [120614 03:43]:
quoted
+       t.clk_activation = fclk_offset_ns;
+
This too should be fclk_offset, not fclk_offset_ns.
As gpmc_cs_set_timing convert it to ticks from ns,
shouldn't we put it in ns ? 
Hmm I see, something's wrong though.. Some of these we really
want to specify as ticks instead of ns. Your patch was using
1 tick value as 1 ns value, which won't work. When I changed
it back to what I thought was ticks, it just happened to work
probably because of rounding. That's probably the reason why
some of these have been set directly with gpmc_cs_write_reg
as that sets tick values directly.

It seems that we need to still allow both ns and tick values.

Regards,

Tony
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help