[PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: handle additional timings

* Tony Lindgren [off-list ref] [120613 04:36]:

* Mohammed, Afzal [off-list ref] [120612 22:00]:

quoted

Hi Jon,

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 23:06:53, Hunter, Jon wrote:

quoted

Should you at least warn, if you are going to over-write a value?

Yes, that would be better except for too much logging, if Tony
prefers that way I will add. 

If there's a chance it causing file system corruption, we should
test it carefully on the boards before applying. If that's done,
then there's probably no need for warnings. It's safer to disable
NAND for untested boards if there's a chance of breaking the timings.

Actually this patch breaks at least DMA on tusb6010 on n8x0. That's
a MUSB hardware in a wrapper connected to GPMC that's very picky with
the timings.

Got any hints what should be done with the cycle2cycle stuff for
tusb6010?

Tony