* Mohammed, Afzal [off-list ref] [120613 05:43]:

Hi Tony,

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 17:02:17, Tony Lindgren wrote:

quoted

* Mohammed, Afzal [off-list ref] [120612 22:00]:

quoted

Yes, that would be better except for too much logging, if Tony
prefers that way I will add. 

If there's a chance it causing file system corruption, we should
test it carefully on the boards before applying. If that's done,
then there's probably no need for warnings. It's safer to disable
NAND for untested boards if there's a chance of breaking the timings.

By disabling NAND, I understand that you are suggesting to remove
nand initialization done in board file, right ?

Yes, but before we do that, let's fix things first for cases that we
can test, like tusb6010 DMA.
 

And boards that can be tested here are omap3evm & beagleboard,
both of which can't be tested for this change.

Or should additional timings be achieved without affecting old
interface, but that it seems would necessitate more code
duplication.

We should just keep the same timings as before, with values
added for the newly added registers.

Regards,

Tony