On Wed, 16 May 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 16 May 2012, Lior Amsalem wrote:
quoted
quoted
Thanks for the list, very helpful!
So do you think it makes sense to put all of these into mach-orion?
Well, Orion is old and seems like not the best name for a directory to include
all the new platforms.
We are discussing it internally as well and I'll update with our suggestion.
The name has the advantage that we have a bunch of drivers using it already:
arch/arm/plat-orion/gpio.c
arch/arm/plat-orion/irq.c
arch/arm/plat-orion/mpp.c
arch/arm/plat-orion/pcie.c
arch/arm/plat-orion/time.c
drivers/mtd/nand/orion_nand.c
drivers/spi/spi-orion.c
drivers/usb/host/ehci-orion.c
drivers/watchdog/orion_wdt.c
AFAICT, those are shared between most of those socs, and I would not want
to change the code in them to the new name.
Why not? Module aliases can be used if that is a concern.
If we change the directory
name to something completely different, it no longer matches the driver
names.
I wouldn't consider this as a major concern. For example, the ethernet
driver that all those SOCs use is not called "orion".
Nicolas