Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)
From: Khalid Aziz <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-08 20:17:31
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml, sparclinux
From: Khalid Aziz <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-08 20:17:31
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml, sparclinux
On 03/08/2016 12:57 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Khalid Aziz <redacted> Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:06:43 -0700quoted
Good questions. Isn't set of valid VAs already constrained by VA_BITS (set to 44 in arch/sparc/include/asm/processor_64.h)? As I see it we are already not using the top 4 bits. Please correct me if I am wrong.Another limiting constraint is the number of address bits coverable by the 4-level page tables we use. And this is sign extended so we have a top-half and a bottom-half with a "hole" in the center of the VA space. I want some clarification on the top bits during ADI accesses. If ADI is enabled, then the top bits of the virtual address are intepreted as tag bits. Once "verified" with the ADI settings, what happense to these tag bits? Are they dropped from the virtual address before being passed down the TLB et al. for translations?
Bits 63-60 (tag bits) are dropped from the virtual address before being passed down the TLB for translation when PSTATE.mcde = 1. -- Khalid
If not, then this means you have to map ADI memory to the correct location so that the tags match up. And if that's the case, if you really wanted to mix tags within a single page, you'd have to map that page several times, once for each and every cacheline granular tag you'd like to use within that page.
-- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>