Thread (62 messages) 62 messages, 8 authors, 2016-03-08

Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2016-03-07 19:09:28
Also in: linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml, sparclinux

From: Khalid Aziz <redacted>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 11:04:38 -0700
On 03/07/2016 09:56 AM, David Miller wrote:
quoted
From: Khalid Aziz <redacted>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:07:53 -0700
quoted
PR_GET_SPARC_ADICAPS
Put this into a new ELF auxiliary vector entry via ARCH_DLINFO.

So now all that's left is supposedly the TAG stuff, please explain
that to me so I can direct you to the correct existing interface to
provide that as well.

Really, try to avoid prtctl, it's poorly typed and almost worse than
ioctl().
The two remaining operations I am looking at are:

1. Is PSTATE.mcde bit set for the process? PR_SET_SPARC_ADI provides
this in its return value in the patch I sent.
Unnecessary.  If any ADI mappings exist then mcde is set, otherwise it is
clear.  This is internal state and the application has no need to every
set nor query it.

It is implicit from the mprotect() calls the user makes to enable ADI
regions.
2. Is TTE.mcd set for a given virtual address? PR_GET_SPARC_ADI_STATUS
provides this function in the patch I sent.
Again, implied by the mprotect() calls.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help