Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)
From: James Morris <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-07 23:35:58
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml, sparclinux
From: James Morris <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-07 23:35:58
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml, sparclinux
On 03/08/2016 07:58 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Khalid Aziz <redacted> Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 13:41:39 -0700quoted
Shared data may not always be backed by a file. My understanding is one of the use cases is for in-memory databases. This shared space could also be used to hand off transactions in flight to other processes. These transactions in flight would not be backed by a file. Some of these use cases might not use shmfs even. Setting ADI bits at virtual address level catches all these cases since what backs the tagged virtual address can be anything - a mapped file, mmio space, just plain chunk of memory.Frankly the most interesting use case to me is simply finding bugs and memory scribbles, and for that we're want to be able to ADI arbitrary memory returned from malloc() and friends. I personally see ADI more as a debugging than a security feature, but that's just my view.
This is certainly a major use of the feature. The Solaris folks have made some interesting use of it here: https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E37069_01/html/E37085/gphwb.html -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>