Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)
From: Andy Lutomirski <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-07 18:08:55
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml, sparclinux
From: Andy Lutomirski <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-07 18:08:55
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml, sparclinux
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Khalid Aziz [off-list ref] wrote:
On 03/07/2016 09:56 AM, David Miller wrote:quoted
From: Khalid Aziz <redacted> Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:07:53 -0700quoted
PR_GET_SPARC_ADICAPSPut this into a new ELF auxiliary vector entry via ARCH_DLINFO. So now all that's left is supposedly the TAG stuff, please explain that to me so I can direct you to the correct existing interface to provide that as well. Really, try to avoid prtctl, it's poorly typed and almost worse than ioctl().The two remaining operations I am looking at are: 1. Is PSTATE.mcde bit set for the process? PR_SET_SPARC_ADI provides this in its return value in the patch I sent. 2. Is TTE.mcd set for a given virtual address? PR_GET_SPARC_ADI_STATUS provides this function in the patch I sent. Setting and clearing version tags can be done entirely from userspace: while (addr < end) { asm volatile( "stxa %1, [%0]ASI_MCD_PRIMARY\n\t" : : "r" (addr), "r" (version)); addr += adicap.blksz; } so I do not have to add any kernel code for tags.
Is the effect of that to change the tag associated with a page to which the caller has write access? I sense DoS issues in your future.