Hey Stephan,

On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 9:57 PM, Stephan Beyer [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

 int cmd_bisect__helper(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)

@@ -643,6 +794,10 @@ int cmd_bisect__helper(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
                       N_("print out the bisect terms"), BISECT_TERMS),
              OPT_CMDMODE(0, "bisect-start", &cmdmode,
                       N_("start the bisect session"), BISECT_START),
+             OPT_CMDMODE(0, "bisect-next", &cmdmode,
+                      N_("find the next bisection commit"), BISECT_NEXT),
+             OPT_CMDMODE(0, "bisect-auto-next", &cmdmode,
+                      N_("verify the next bisection state then find the next bisection state"), BISECT_AUTO_NEXT),

The next bisection *state* is found?

checkout is more appropriate. I don't remember why I used "find".

"checkout the next bisection commit" maybe?

Seems better. Thanks!

Regards,
Pranit Bauva