Re: [PATCH v15 19/27] bisect--helper: `bisect_state` & `bisect_head` shell function in C
From: Pranit Bauva <hidden>
Date: 2016-12-06 22:40:48
Hey Stephan, On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 5:42 AM, Stephan Beyer [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi, On 10/14/2016 04:14 PM, Pranit Bauva wrote:quoted
Reimplement the `bisect_state` shell function in C and also add a subcommand `--bisect-state` to `git-bisect--helper` to call it from git-bisect.sh . Using `--bisect-state` subcommand is a temporary measure to port shell function to C so as to use the existing test suite. As more functions are ported, this subcommand will be retired and will be called by some other methods. `bisect_head` is called from `bisect_state` thus its not required to introduce another subcommand.Missing comma before "thus", and "it is" (or "it's") instead of "its" :)
Sure, will fix.
quoted
diff --git a/builtin/bisect--helper.c b/builtin/bisect--helper.c index 1767916..1481c6d 100644 --- a/builtin/bisect--helper.c +++ b/builtin/bisect--helper.c@@ -784,6 +786,79 @@ static int bisect_autostart(struct bisect_terms *terms) return 0; } +static char *bisect_head(void) +{ + if (is_empty_or_missing_file(git_path_bisect_head())) + return "HEAD"; + else + return "BISECT_HEAD"; +}This is very shellish. In C I'd expect something like static int bisect_head_sha1(unsigned char *sha) { int res; if (is_empty_or_missing_file(git_path_bisect_head())) res = get_sha1("HEAD", sha); else res = get_sha1("BISECT_HEAD", sha); if (res) return error(_("Could not find BISECT_HEAD or HEAD.")); return 0; }quoted
+ +static int bisect_state(struct bisect_terms *terms, const char **argv, + int argc) +{ + const char *state = argv[0]; + + get_terms(terms); + if (check_and_set_terms(terms, state)) + return -1; + + if (!argc) + die(_("Please call `--bisect-state` with at least one argument"));I think this check should move to cmd_bisect__helper. There are also the other argument number checks.
Not really. After the whole conversion, the cmdmode will cease to exists while bisect_state will be called directly, thus it is important to check it here.
quoted
+ + if (argc == 1 && one_of(state, terms->term_good, + terms->term_bad, "skip", NULL)) { + const char *bisected_head = xstrdup(bisect_head()); + const char *hex[1];Maybe: const char *hex;quoted
+ unsigned char sha1[20]; + + if (get_sha1(bisected_head, sha1)) + die(_("Bad rev input: %s"), bisected_head);And instead of...quoted
+ if (bisect_write(state, sha1_to_hex(sha1), terms, 0)) + return -1; + + *hex = xstrdup(sha1_to_hex(sha1)); + if (check_expected_revs(hex, 1)) + return -1;... simply: hex = xstrdup(sha1_to_hex(sha1)); if (set_state(terms, state, hex)) { free(hex); return -1; } free(hex); where:
Yes I am planning to convert all places with hex rather than the sha1 but not yet, maybe in an another patch series because currently a lot of things revolve around sha1 and changing its behaviour wouldn't really be a part of a porting patch series.
static int set_state(struct bisect_terms *terms, const char *state, const char *hex) { if (bisect_write(state, hex, terms, 0)) return -1; if (check_expected_revs(&hex, 1)) return -1; return 0; }quoted
+ return bisect_auto_next(terms, NULL); + } + + if ((argc == 2 && !strcmp(state, terms->term_bad)) || + one_of(state, terms->term_good, "skip", NULL)) { + int i; + struct string_list hex = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP; + + for (i = 1; i < argc; i++) { + unsigned char sha1[20]; + + if (get_sha1(argv[i], sha1)) { + string_list_clear(&hex, 0); + die(_("Bad rev input: %s"), argv[i]); + } + string_list_append(&hex, sha1_to_hex(sha1)); + } + for (i = 0; i < hex.nr; i++) {... And replace this:quoted
+ const char **hex_string = (const char **) &hex.items[i].string; + if(bisect_write(state, *hex_string, terms, 0)) { + string_list_clear(&hex, 0); + return -1; + } + if (check_expected_revs(hex_string, 1)) { + string_list_clear(&hex, 0); + return -1; + }by: const char *hex_str = hex.items[i].string; if (set_state(terms, state, hex_string)) { string_list_clear(&hex, 0); return -1; }quoted
+ } + string_list_clear(&hex, 0); + return bisect_auto_next(terms, NULL); + } + + if (!strcmp(state, terms->term_bad)) + die(_("'git bisect %s' can take only one argument."), + terms->term_bad); + + return -1; +} + int cmd_bisect__helper(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) { enum {@@ -823,6 +899,8 @@ int cmd_bisect__helper(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) N_("verify the next bisection state then find the next bisection state"), BISECT_AUTO_NEXT), OPT_CMDMODE(0, "bisect-autostart", &cmdmode, N_("start the bisection if BISECT_START empty or missing"), BISECT_AUTOSTART), + OPT_CMDMODE(0, "bisect-state", &cmdmode, + N_("mark the state of ref (or refs)"), BISECT_STATE),"mark the state of the given revs" Note that rev != ref
Might have been a typo. Will fix.
quoted
@@ -902,6 +980,14 @@ int cmd_bisect__helper(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) terms.term_bad = "bad"; res = bisect_autostart(&terms); break; + case BISECT_STATE: + if (argc == 0) + die(_("--bisect-state requires at least 1 argument"));"at least one revision"
Okay, that would make it more specific.
quoted
diff --git a/git-bisect.sh b/git-bisect.sh index cd56551..a9eebbb 100755 --- a/git-bisect.sh +++ b/git-bisect.sh@@ -61,44 +51,7 @@ bisect_skip() { esac all="$all $revs" done - eval bisect_state 'skip' $all[...deleted lines...]quoted
+ eval git bisect--helper --bisect-state 'skip' $allI think you don't need "eval" here any longer.
Yes, I wouldn't
quoted
@@ -184,8 +137,8 @@ exit code \$res from '\$command' is < 0 or >= 128" >&2 state="$TERM_GOOD" fi - # We have to use a subshell because "bisect_state" can exit. - ( bisect_state $state >"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_RUN" ) + # We have to use a subshell because "--bisect-state" can exit. + ( git bisect--helper --bisect-state $state >"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_RUN" )
True, but right now I didn't want to modify that part of the source code to remove the comment. I will remove the comment all together when I port bisect_run() Regards, Pranit Bauva