Hey Stephan,

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:03 AM, Pranit Bauva [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

I don't understand why the return value is int and not void. To avoid a
"return 0;" line when calling this function?

Initially I thought I would be using the return value but now I
realize that it is meaningless to do so. Using void seems better. :)

I just recollected when I was creating the next iteration of this
series that I will need that int.

quoted

quoted

+     case CHECK_EXPECTED_REVS:
+             return check_expected_revs(argv, argc);

See this.

Regards,
Pranit Bauva