Re: [PATCH v15 08/27] bisect--helper: `is_expected_rev` & `check_expected_revs` shell function in C
From: Stephan Beyer <hidden>
Date: 2016-12-17 19:55:42
Hi Pranit, On 12/16/2016 08:35 PM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:17 AM, Stephan Beyer [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 10/14/2016 04:14 PM, Pranit Bauva wrote:quoted
diff --git a/builtin/bisect--helper.c b/builtin/bisect--helper.c index d84ba86..c542e8b 100644 --- a/builtin/bisect--helper.c +++ b/builtin/bisect--helper.c@@ -123,13 +123,40 @@ static int bisect_reset(const char *commit) return bisect_clean_state(); } +static int is_expected_rev(const char *expected_hex) +{ + struct strbuf actual_hex = STRBUF_INIT; + int res = 0; + if (strbuf_read_file(&actual_hex, git_path_bisect_expected_rev(), 0) >= 40) { + strbuf_trim(&actual_hex); + res = !strcmp(actual_hex.buf, expected_hex); + } + strbuf_release(&actual_hex); + return res; +}I am not sure it does what it should. I would expect the following behavior from this function: - file does not exist (or is "broken") => return 0 - actual_hex != expected_hex => return 0 - otherwise return 1 If I am not wrong, the code does the following instead: - file does not exist (or is "broken") => return 0 - actual_hex != expected_hex => return 1 - otherwise => return 0It seems that I didn't carefully see what the shell code is (or apparently did a mistake in understanding it ;)). I think the C version does exactly what the shell version does. Can you confirm it once again, please?
I check again... The shell code does the following: - file does not exist or is not a regular file => return false - actual_hex != expected_hex => return false - otherwise => return true (false means a value != 0, true means 0) Your code does the following: - file cannot be read or is broken => return 0 - actual_hex != expected_hex => return 0 - otherwise => return 1 So you are very right, it seems I had a weird thinko (I probably missed the "!" in front of strcmp or something) :) Sorry for bothering, Stephan