Re: [PATCH] Add a new lstat and fstat implementation based on Win32 API

Hi,

On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Johannes Sixt wrote:

Johannes Schindelin schrieb:

quoted

I saw some funny stuff on Windows, like test cases succeeding when run
interactively, but failing when run from "make test".

That's very likely the issue that we work around by inserting "sleep 1" at
strategic points, which is a timing (race condition) issue and does not
depend on interactive vs. "make test".

Makes sense to me now.  Especially around t5510 -- t5701 I see those (and 
I do not run "make test" often, since it takes _ages_.

Thanks,
Dscho