Thread (354 messages) 354 messages, 18 authors, 2021-01-29

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v20 2/4] eal: improve comments around power monitoring API

From: Thomas Monjalon <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-29 11:27:45

22/01/2021 18:12, Anatoly Burakov:
Currently, the API documentation is ambiguous as to what happens when
certain conditions are met. Document the behavior explicitly, as well as
fix some typos and outdated comments.

Fixes: 6a17919b0e2a ("eal: change power intrinsics API")

Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <redacted>
---
  * Monitor specific address for changes. This will cause the CPU to enter an
  * architecture-defined optimized power state until either the specified
  * memory address is written to, a certain TSC timestamp is reached, or other
  * reasons cause the CPU to wake up.
  *
- * Additionally, an `expected` 64-bit value and 64-bit mask are provided. If
- * mask is non-zero, the current value pointed to by the `p` pointer will be
- * checked against the expected value, and if they match, the entering of
- * optimized power state may be aborted.
+ * Additionally, an expected value (`pmc->val`), mask (`pmc->mask`), and data
+ * size (`pmc->size`) are provided in the `pmc` power monitoring condition. If
+ * the mask is non-zero, the current value pointed to by the `pmc->addr` pointer
+ * will be read and compared against the expected value, and if they match, the
+ * entering of optimized power state will be aborted. This is intended to
+ * prevent the CPU from entering optimized power state and waiting on a write
+ * that has already happened by the time this API is called.
I think that's a lot better. Thank you.
Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <redacted>


Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help