Thread (49 messages) 49 messages, 5 authors, 2018-01-28

Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] eal: introduce DMA memory barriers

From: Yongseok Koh <hidden>
Date: 2018-01-22 18:29:34

On Jan 18, 2018, at 11:16 PM, Andrew Rybchenko [off-list ref] wrote:

On 01/19/2018 03:44 AM, Yongseok Koh wrote:
quoted
This commit introduces rte_dma_wmb() and rte_dma_rmb(), in order to
guarantee the ordering of coherent shared memory between the CPU and a DMA
capable device.

Signed-off-by: Yongseok Koh 
[off-list ref]
Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <redacted>

It is already really good. Many thanks.
Thank you!
Maybe it would be useful to:
 - avoid duplication of so long explanations (put in in one place and add reference?)
May have to ask Thomas how to do this. Thomas?
 - explain why it is bound to DMA or call it in a different way, since right now it is bound
   to coherent-mapped IO (rte_cio_rmb() ?). Yes, I see benefits to follow Linux
   terminology, but may be DPDK can do better :) I just add my concerns, but let
   EAL code maintainers to decide
Good idea. Like to hear from other people. But, following linux terms sometime
could be good to welcome developers from kernel community to DPDK world. :-)

To people in the cc list, any other concerns?
Especially ARM users - Jianbo and Jerin?

Thanks,
Yongseok
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help