Thank you for your feedback

patch3 primarily includes code that does not require extensive review,
such as the message codes and message body structures defined in
nbl_def_channel.h. These components are generally stable and
used for PF/VF communication, which is why they were initially
included in Patch 3. However, based on review feedback, I will
extract these manually written communication protocol definitions.

Additionally, I will make another round of comprehensive code
reduction to meet the submission requirements as much as possible.


------------------------------------------------------------------
发件人：Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref]
发送时间：2026年1月28日(周三) 02:53
收件人：Simon Horman[off-list ref]; Illusion Wang[off-list ref]
抄　送：Dimon[off-list ref]; Alvin[off-list ref]; Sam[off-list ref]; netdev[off-list ref]; "andrew+netdev"[off-list ref]; corbet[off-list ref]; "linux-doc"[off-list ref]; lorenzo[off-list ref]; pabeni[off-list ref]; "vadim.fedorenko"[off-list ref]; "lukas.bulwahn"[off-list ref]; hawk[off-list ref]; ast[off-list ref]; bpf[off-list ref]; sdf[off-list ref]; daniel[off-list ref]; "john.fastabend"[off-list ref]; edumazet[off-list ref]; open list[off-list ref]
主　题：Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 00/15] nbl driver for Nebulamatrix NICs


On Tue, 27 Jan 2026 18:06:49 +0000 Simon Horman wrote:

As per Jakub's advice in his review of v1 [*],
Please try to create a minimal driver in the order of ~5kLoC.

Perhaps other maintainers will disagree, but for ease of review
and to avoid the huge reposts perhaps we should consider merging
something like patches 1 and 3* first, as the initial series.
And then you can build up the driver from there in reasonable,
5kLoC-at-a-time series?

 * patch 3 currently includes things which do not seem machine
   generated / like register descriptors like structs added to
   nbl_def_channel.h and nbl_include.h