Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: mctp: Add MCTP USB transport driver
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2025-02-07 12:18:43
Also in:
linux-usb
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 05:45:33PM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
Hi Greg,quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ dev_err(&mctp_usb->usbdev->dev, "%s: urb status: %d\n", + __func__, status);This could flood the logs, are you sure you need it at dev_err() level? And __func__ is redundant, it's present in dev_*() calls already.am I missing something then? [ 146.130170] usb 2-1: short packet (hdr) 6 emitted from: dev_dbg(&mctp_usb->usbdev->dev, "short packet (hdr) %d\n", hdr->len); Seems like we get the driver name, but not the function. I'm happy to remove the __func__ output either way, but I will also make the logs a little more descriptive for context, if we don't have func data.Please read Documentation/admin-guide/dynamic-debug-howto.rst, it shows how to get the function information from the dev_dbg() lines at runtime. In short: $ alias ddcmd='echo $* > /proc/dynamic_debug/control' # add function to all enabled messages $ ddcmd '+f'Your original comment was on the dev_err() call though (sorry, I've complicated the discussion by using a dev_dbg() example).
Sorry, I got confused here too, I saw it on dev_dbg() calls in my review.
Looks like only dev_dbg (and not _err/_warn/etc) has provision for __func__, is that right?
Yes.
I've since removed the __func__ references anyway, and replaced with better context on the messages, but keen to make sure I have the correct understanding in general.
That sounds better, avoiding __func__ wherever possible is usually a good idea. thanks, gre gk-h