On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:08:40 +0200 Gal Pressman wrote:
On 26/02/2025 3:01, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
quoted
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 09:13:48 +0200 Gal Pressman wrote:
quoted
Context 0 (default context) always exists, there is no need to check
whether it exists or not when adding a flow steering rule.
The existing check fails when creating a flow steering rule for context
0 as it is not stored in the rss_ctx xarray.
But what is the use case for redirecting to context 0?
I can think of something like redirecting all TCP traffic to context 1,
and then a specific TCP 5-tuple to the default context.
The ordering guarantees of ntuple filters are a bit unclear.
My understanding was that first match terminates the search,
actually, so your example wouldn't work :S
Anyway, it used to work.
To be clear unit tests don't count as "breaking real users",
and I assume the complaint comes from your QA team?
Given the weak definition of the ntuple API I'd prefer to
close this corner case. Unless someone feels strongly that
this should be allowed. If a real user complains we can both
fix and try to encode their flow into a selftest.
Let me CC Ed, too.