Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] sfc: support PTP over IPv6/UDP
From: Íñigo Huguet <hidden>
Date: 2022-08-30 06:12:07
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 2:29 AM Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 09:03:44 +0200 Íñigo Huguet wrote:quoted
quoted
We usually defer refactoring for coding style issues until someone is otherwise touching the code, so surrounding code doing something against the guidance may be misleading.Yes but I'm not sure what I should do in this case... all other efx_filter_xxx functions are in filter.h, so putting this one in a different place could make it difficult to understand how the files are organized. Should I put the declaration in the header (without `inline`) and the definition in a new filter.c file? Should I move all other definitions to this new file?Hm, I see, perhaps adding a new filter.c would be too much for your set. Let's leave the definition in the header then.quoted
Also, what's exactly the rule, apart from not using `inline`, to avoid doing the same thing again: to avoid function definitions directly in header files?Not sure I'm parsing the question right, but it's okay to add small functions in local headers. Here it seem to have only been used in one place, and I didn't see the context.
I expresed it terribly badly, but you parsed it right. Thanks, now I understand what your concern was. -- Íñigo Huguet