Hello Marc and Max,

On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 7:33 PM Max Staudt [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 19:28:45 +0200
Dario Binacchi [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 7:21 PM Marc Kleine-Budde [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Ok - We avoided writing bit timing registers from user space into the
hardware for all existing drivers. If there isn't a specific use case,
let's skip this patch. If someone comes up with a use case we can think
of a proper solution.

Ok. So do I also remove the 7/9 "ethtool: add support to get/set CAN
bit time register"
patch ?

If I may answer as well - IMHO, yes.

Unless we know that BTR is something other than just a different way to
express the bitrate, I'd skip it, yes. Because bitrate is already
handled by other, cross-device mechanisms.

Thanks to both of you for the explanations.
Regards,

Dario

Max

-- 

Dario Binacchi

Embedded Linux Developer

dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com

__________________________________


Amarula Solutions SRL

Via Le Canevare 30, 31100 Treviso, Veneto, IT

T. +39 042 243 5310
info@amarulasolutions.com

www.amarulasolutions.com