Thread (31 messages) 31 messages, 4 authors, 2022-07-31

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 8/9] can: slcan: add support to set bit time register (btr)

From: Max Staudt <max@enpas.org>
Date: 2022-07-27 18:36:34
Also in: linux-can, lkml

On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 19:28:45 +0200
Dario Binacchi [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 7:21 PM Marc Kleine-Budde [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Ok - We avoided writing bit timing registers from user space into the
hardware for all existing drivers. If there isn't a specific use case,
let's skip this patch. If someone comes up with a use case we can think
of a proper solution.  
Ok. So do I also remove the 7/9 "ethtool: add support to get/set CAN
bit time register"
patch ?
If I may answer as well - IMHO, yes.

Unless we know that BTR is something other than just a different way to
express the bitrate, I'd skip it, yes. Because bitrate is already
handled by other, cross-device mechanisms.


Max
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help