RE: [PATCH V11 4/5] vsprintf: add printk specifier %px
From: David Laight <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-30 10:38:06
Also in:
lkml
From: Kees Cook
Sent: 29 November 2017 22:28 On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:07 AM, David Laight [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Linus Torvaldsquoted
Sent: 29 November 2017 02:29 On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Tobin C. Harding [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Let's add specifier %px as a clear, opt-in, way to print a pointer and maintain some level of isolation from all the other hex integer output within the Kernel.Yes, I like this model. It's easy and it's obvious ("'x' for hex"), and it gives people a good way to say "yes, I really want the actual address as hex" for if/when the hashed pointer doesn't work for some reason.Remind me to change every %p to %px on kernels that support it. Although the absolute values of pointers may not be useful, knowing that two pointer differ by a small amount is useful. It is also useful to know whether pointers are to stack, code, static data or heap. This change to %p is going to make debugging a nightmare.In the future, maybe we could have a knob: unhashed, hashed (default), or zeroed.
Add a 4th, hashed_page+offset. Isn't there already a knob for %pK, bits in the same value could be used. That would make it easy to ensure that %pK is more restructive than %p. David