RE: [PATCH V11 4/5] vsprintf: add printk specifier %px
From: Roberts, William C <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-29 22:36:32
Also in:
lkml
-----Original Message----- From: keescook@google.com [mailto:keescook@google.com] On Behalf Of Kees Cook Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 2:28 PM To: David Laight <redacted> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>; Tobin C. Harding [off-list ref]; kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com; Jason A. Donenfeld [off-list ref]; Theodore Ts'o [off-list ref]; Paolo Bonzini [off-list ref]; Tycho Andersen [off-list ref]; Roberts, William C [off-list ref]; Tejun Heo [off-list ref]; Jordan Glover [off-list ref]; Greg KH [off-list ref]; Petr Mladek [off-list ref]; Joe Perches [off-list ref]; Ian Campbell [off-list ref]; Sergey Senozhatsky [off-list ref]; Catalin Marinas [off-list ref]; Will Deacon [off-list ref]; Steven Rostedt [off-list ref]; Chris Fries [off-list ref]; Dave Weinstein [off-list ref]; Daniel Micay [off-list ref]; Djalal Harouni [off-list ref]; Radim Krcmár [off-list ref]; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux- kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Network Development [off-list ref]; David Miller [off-list ref]; Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref]; Andrey Ryabinin [off-list ref]; Alexander Potapenko [off-list ref]; Dmitry Vyukov [off-list ref]; Andrew Morton [off-list ref] Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 4/5] vsprintf: add printk specifier %px On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:07 AM, David Laight [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Linus Torvaldsquoted
Sent: 29 November 2017 02:29 On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Tobin C. Harding [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Let's add specifier %px as a clear, opt-in, way to print a pointer and maintain some level of isolation from all the other hex integer output within the Kernel.Yes, I like this model. It's easy and it's obvious ("'x' for hex"), and it gives people a good way to say "yes, I really want the actual address as hex" for if/when the hashed pointer doesn't work for some reason.Remind me to change every %p to %px on kernels that support it. Although the absolute values of pointers may not be useful, knowing that two pointer differ by a small amount is useful. It is also useful to know whether pointers are to stack, code, static data or heap. This change to %p is going to make debugging a nightmare.In the future, maybe we could have a knob: unhashed, hashed (default), or zeroed.
Isn't that just kptr_restrict and get us right back to the simpler patches I proposed?
-Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security