On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 15:27:46 +1100
"Tobin C. Harding" [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 09:39:57PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:05:02 +1100
"Tobin C. Harding" [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
+ /*
+ * kptr_restrict==1 cannot be used in IRQ context
+ * because its test for CAP_SYSLOG would be meaningless.
+ */
+ if (in_irq() || in_serving_softirq() || in_nmi())
This could be replaced with:
if (!in_task())
Which is actually more efficient.
thanks for the comment Steve. At this late stage in the game do you mind
if I don't include this change in this set. The code line in question is
only in the series because of refactoring. I'm comfortable arguing that
improving efficiency is out of scope ;)
No problem. In fact, I can send this as a separate patch myself, on top
of your series.
-- Steve