Re: [PATCH v5] net: ip, diag -- Add diag interface for raw sockets

On 16-09-28 07:27 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 07:06:26AM -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:

quoted

quoted

This structure is uapi, so anyone has complete rights to reference
@pad in the userspace programs. Sure it would be more clear to remove
the @pad completely, but if we choose so I think it's better to do
on top instead and then if someone complain we can easily revert
the single trivial commit instead of this big patch.

I am conflicted.
A field labelled "pad" does not appear to be valid as "UAPI". It is
a cosmetic indicator. If you did sizeof() with or without it being
present the value doesnt change.

I think you miss the point what I'm trying to say: currently end-user
may have reference to this member (for any reason) and his program
will compile and run. If we change the name the compilation procedure
fails and this will break API. Yes, referrning @pad is bad idea for
userspace code, and yes (!) better to simply rename it but lets do
that later, on top, so that if we break something in userspace
we could easily revert the oneline change.

I understood well your point;-> Maybe my response was not clear:
_nobody should be fscking fondling pad fields_ setting them or
otherwise.
Maybe let these programs fail. I asked if you knew any such app which
did anything with a pad field.

cheers,
jamal