Re: [net-next PATCH 0/7] tc offload for cls_u32 on ixgbe
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: 2016-02-04 23:19:37
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 10:16:56AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 10:27:32AM CET, john.fastabend@gmail.com wrote:quoted
Also by adding get_parse_graph and set_parse_graph attributes as in my previous flow_api work we can build programmable devices and programmatically learn when rules can or can not be loaded into the hardware. Again future work. Any comments/feedback appreciated.I like this being thin and elegant solution. However, ~2 years ago when I pushed openvswitch kernel datapath offload patchset, people were yelling at me that it is not generic enough solution, that tc has to be able to use the api (Jamal :)), nftables as well.
I would be glad to join this debate during NetDev 1.1 too. I think we should provide a solution that allows people uses both tc and nftables, this would require a bit of generic infrastructure on top of it so we don't restrict users to one single solution, in other words, we allow the user to select its own poison.
Now this patch is making offload strictly tc-based and nobody seems to care :) I do. I think that we might try to find some generic middle layer.
I agree and I'll be happy to help to push this ahead. Let's try to sit and get together to resolve this. See you soon.