Re: [PATCH 1/8] netpoll: use GFP_ATOMIC in slave_enable_netpoll() and __netpoll_setup()

On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 17:20 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:

On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:23 +0800, Cong Wang wrote:

quoted

slave_enable_netpoll() and __netpoll_setup() may be called
with read_lock() held, so should use GFP_ATOMIC to allocate
memory. Eric suggested to pass gfp flags to __netpoll_setup().

Cc: Eric Dumazet <redacted>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <redacted>
---

You based this on net-next, but didnt add the net-next suffix in your
[PATCH ...] description.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

Oh, it is default, isn't it? :-D Anyway, I will add it the next time
when I send network patches.

Thanks!