Le mardi 01 mars 2011 à 13:51 +0800, Po-Yu Chuang a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I am only wondering then if not using fragments would be faster then
(eventually doing copybreaks for small frames like tg3)
Although not many circumstances are tested.
iperf shows that it is a little faster to use fragments than memcpy, so...
This might be a side effect of skb->truesize being smaller with
fragments than "regular packets" and socket backlog congestion.
If a full page was really accounted for in skb->truesize, instead of
used length, performance might be the same or lower :(
- skb->truesize += length;
+ skb->truesize += PAGE_SIZE;
This has nothing to do with your driver, but a core implementation
detail.