On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 07:22:47PM -0700, David Miller wrote:

Of course, you can solve the issue by redefining problem. :-)

However, such a semantic is not what users of this feature
are after.  I doubt there would be much uptake of it even
if we did implement it.

I did say it wasn't a good answer :)

My main point is that whatever we do for the limiting qdiscs
should not penalise the non-limiting qdiscs because for the
moment people are trying to get more out of their NICs rather
than less :)

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} [off-list ref]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt