From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <redacted>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 20:31:09 +0200 (EET)

On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Petr Tesarik wrote:

quoted

Ilpo Järvinen píse v St 03. 12. 2008 v 13:22 +0200:
Yes, re-fragmenting the packet here is probably the best way to go. But
repeating the same condition on multiple places is not so nice. What
about this little improvement?

Yeah, this too will work... Though not of too much significance since
I've already most of unification of those two functions in a local
queue awaiting testing, polish up and submit to net-next.

When sending an updated version davem prefers to have full changelog in it 
btw, it saves some work for him.

quoted

(I didn't roll the revert of 33cf71cee1 into it, as it makes the actual
change less obvious. I think there are better ways of doing a revert in
git.)

Whatever, I've no strong opinion either way though it's just broken with 
and without the revert anyway, the full thing is needed to actually fix 
it.

I've applied Ilpo's version of the fix patch, thanks everyone.