Corey Minyard a écrit :

I believe there is a race in this patch:

+    sk_for_each_rcu(sk, node, &hslot->head) {
+        /*
+         * lockless reader, and SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU items:
+         * We must check this item was not moved to another chain
+         */
+        if (udp_hashfn(net, sk->sk_hash) != hash)
+            goto begin;
        score = compute_score(sk, net, hnum, saddr, sport, daddr, dport, 
dif);
        if (score > badness) {
            result = sk;
            badness = score;
        }
    }

If the socket is moved from one list to another list in-between the time 
the hash is calculated and the next field is accessed, and the socket 
has moved to the end of the new list, the traversal will not complete 
properly on the list it should have, since the socket will be on the end 
of the new list and there's not a way to tell it's on a new list and 
restart the list traversal.  I think that this can be solved by 
pre-fetching the "next" field (with proper barriers) before checking the 
hash.

You are absolutely right. As we *need* next pointer anyway for the prefetch(),
we can store it, so that its value is kept.

I also might be nice to have a way to avoid recomputing the score the 
second time, perhaps using a sequence number of some type.

Well, computing score is really cheap, everything is in cache, granted
the chain was not really huge and high score item at the beginning.

Adding yet another field in sock structure should be avoided if possible.

Thanks

[PATCH] udp: introduce sk_for_each_rcu_safenext()

Corey Minyard found a race added in commit 271b72c7fa82c2c7a795bc16896149933110672d
(udp: RCU handling for Unicast packets.)

 "If the socket is moved from one list to another list in-between the time 
  the hash is calculated and the next field is accessed, and the socket 
  has moved to the end of the new list, the traversal will not complete 
  properly on the list it should have, since the socket will be on the end 
  of the new list and there's not a way to tell it's on a new list and 
  restart the list traversal.  I think that this can be solved by 
  pre-fetching the "next" field (with proper barriers) before checking the 
  hash."

This patch corrects this problem, introducing a new sk_for_each_rcu_safenext()
macro.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <redacted>
---
 include/linux/rculist.h |   17 +++++++++++++++++
 include/net/sock.h      |    4 ++--
 net/ipv4/udp.c          |    4 ++--
 net/ipv6/udp.c          |    4 ++--
 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)