Thread (95 messages) 95 messages, 4 authors, 2008-10-01

Re: xfrm_state locking regression...

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2008-09-10 05:23:37

From: Timo Teräs <redacted>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:16:12 +0300
David Miller wrote:
quoted
ipsec: Restore hash based xfrm_state dumping.

Get rid of ->all member of struct xfrm_state, and just use a hash
iteration like we used before.

This shrinks the size of struct xfrm_state, and also restores the
dump ordering of 2.6.25 and previous.
I think bad things will happen if the hash gets resized between
xfrm_state_walk() calls. Since it assumes that the walk->state
entry has remained in walk->chain bucket.

The dumping order shouldn't really make any difference. But
reducing struct xfrm_state is definitely good. The only downside
is that when an entry is inserted to the beginning of the hash
while dump is ongoing, it won't be dumped at all. But that is
not really a problem since you get a notification about that
entry separately.
That's a good point, the hash resizing case.

If the hash grows, we'll see some entries again.

If it shrinks, we might skip some instead, which is very undesirable.

Actually, thinking about it some more, both possibilities (skipping
and dups) seem to be possible in both situations (growing and
shrinking).

Ehm... I think we should put this patch and idea aside for a little bit.
:-)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help