Thomas Graf wrote:

* Thomas Graf [off-list ref] 2006-06-30 18:32

quoted

Anyways, I give up. Last time I've been running after you trying
to fix the many bugs you leave behind. Ever noticed that whenever
you add some new code it's someone else following up with tons of
small bugfix patches having a hard time trying to figure out the
actual intent. I'll just duplicate the code for my purpose, so
much easier.

There you go, leaves ifb broken as-is, at least prevents it
from crashing randomly when the input_dev disappears.

That would be a pity. After this patch has been ACKed, could we start
over with the other bugs one at a time? I wasn't really able to gather
the problems from this thread, but some of the behaviour you mentioned
does seem questionable.