[23/*] [IPV4] Kill remaining unnecessary uses of dst_pmtu
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: 2005-03-18 09:19:18
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: 2005-03-18 09:19:18
Hi Dave: Once again here is a couple of trivial dst_pmtu/dst_mtu replacements. In both locations, we can only have simple dst entries which means that dst == dst->path. BTW, this is the rule that we should apply in future for uses of dst_mtu/dst_pmtu (or other metrics on dst). If the only dst's that can appear are simple dst's (dst == dst->path), then we should use dst_mtu or dst_metric. If dst != dst->path, then whoever is writing the code will need to think about which of dst or dst->path is the right one. In most instances dst will be the one. However, as we have seen in ip_append_data, dst->path may be needed rarely. In particular, if we're doing fragmentation immediately after IPsec, then you may need it. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} [off-list ref] Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt