Thread (114 messages) 114 messages, 9 authors, 2005-04-22

Re: [6/*] [IPSEC] Fix xfrm[46]_update_pmtu to update top dst

From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2005-03-07 05:35:02

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 22:08:42 +1100
Herbert Xu [off-list ref] wrote:
Let's also fix IPsec PMTU storage.  When we get an MTU update for an
xfrm_dst, it should be done to the top dst, not the bottom dst.

For example, when we get a need-to-frag message for host C behind
a our IPsec peer B, we should be updating the dst entry for C and
not B as we do now.

I've removed the boundary checks since the same checks are done
in ipv[46]/route.c already.

Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Applied, thanks Herbert.

Note that sometimes it is better to replace an "unnecessary as
determined by me" boundary check with a BUG() instead of
outright removal.  That way you get to test your assertion :)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help