On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 21:27:41 +1100
Herbert Xu [off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:35:36PM +1100, herbert wrote:

quoted

Here's the patch to fix those two problems.  Yes I know
my dst_check implementation is lame.  I'll come back and
fix up all the dst_check functions by moving their dst_release
calls out.  It proves that you were right in that IPv6 dst
leak thread :)

As promised here is the patch that moves dst_release out of
dst->ops->check.  It bloats sk_dst_check/__sk_dst_check slightly
but they're only used in a handful of places so it isn't too bad.
I actually counted, it's about a few hundred bytes.

Applied, thanks Herbert.