Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 6 authors, 2005-01-31

Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?

From: Yasuyuki KOZAKAI <hidden>
Date: 2005-01-31 05:44:25
Also in: lkml

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

Hi,

From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <redacted>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:16:36 +0900 (JST)
In article [ref] (at Mon, 31 Jan 2005 06:00:40 +0100), Patrick McHardy [off-list ref] says:

|We don't need this for IPv6 yet. Once we get nf_conntrack in we
|might need this, but its IPv6 fragment handling is different from
|ip_conntrack, I need to check first.

Ok. It would be better to have some comment but anyway...
kozakai-san?
IMO, fix for nf_conntrack isn't needed yet. Because someone may change
IPv6 fragment handling in nf_conntrack.

Anyway, current nf_conntrack passes the original (not de-fragmented) skb to
IPv6 stack. nf_conntrack doesn't touch its dst.

Regards,
----------------------------------------
Yasuyuki KOZAKAI

Communication Platform Laboratory,
Corporate Research & Development Center,
Toshiba Corporation

yasuyuki.kozakai@toshiba.co.jp
----------------------------------------
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help