Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 6 authors, 2005-01-31

Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?

From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <hidden>
Date: 2005-01-31 04:45:18
Also in: lkml

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

In article [ref] (at Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:11:32 +1100), Herbert Xu [off-list ref] says:
Patrick McHardy [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Ok, final decision: you are right :) conntrack also defragments locally
generated packets before they hit ip_fragment. In this case the fragments
have skb->dst set.
Well caught.  The same thing is needed for IPv6, right?
(not yet confirmed, but) yes, please.

Signed-off-by: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <redacted>

===== net/ipv6/ip6_output.c 1.82 vs edited =====
--- 1.82/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c	2005-01-25 09:40:10 +09:00
+++ edited/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c	2005-01-31 13:44:01 +09:00
@@ -463,6 +463,7 @@
 	to->priority = from->priority;
 	to->protocol = from->protocol;
 	to->security = from->security;
+	dst_release(to->dst);
 	to->dst = dst_clone(from->dst);
 	to->dev = from->dev;
 

--yoshfuji
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help