Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: 2005-01-31 04:15:43
Also in:
lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2005-01-30 · Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1? · Russell King <hidden>
- 2005-01-30 · Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1? · Phil Oester <hidden>
- 2005-01-30 · Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1? · Russell King <hidden>
- 2005-01-30 · Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1? · Phil Oester <hidden>
- 2005-01-30 · Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1? · Russell King <hidden>
Patrick McHardy [off-list ref] wrote:
Ok, final decision: you are right :) conntrack also defragments locally generated packets before they hit ip_fragment. In this case the fragments have skb->dst set.
Well caught. The same thing is needed for IPv6, right? -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} [off-list ref] Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt