Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 6 authors, 2005-01-31

Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?

From: Patrick McHardy <hidden>
Date: 2005-01-31 05:01:42
Also in: lkml

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / $B5HF#1QL@ wrote:
In article [ref] (at Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:11:32 +1100), Herbert Xu [off-list ref] says:

quoted
Patrick McHardy [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Ok, final decision: you are right :) conntrack also defragments locally
generated packets before they hit ip_fragment. In this case the fragments
have skb->dst set.
Well caught.  The same thing is needed for IPv6, right?
(not yet confirmed, but) yes, please.
We don't need this for IPv6 yet. Once we get nf_conntrack in we
might need this, but its IPv6 fragment handling is different from
ip_conntrack, I need to check first.

Regards
Patrick
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help