Thread (58 messages) 58 messages, 7 authors, 2025-09-15

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Nesting support for lazy MMU mode

From: Kevin Brodsky <hidden>
Date: 2025-09-09 13:59:52
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-mm, lkml, sparclinux, xen-devel

On 09/09/2025 11:21, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 09.09.25 04:16, Andrew Morton wrote:
quoted
On Mon,  8 Sep 2025 08:39:24 +0100 Kevin Brodsky
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The main change enabling nesting is patch 2, following the approach
suggested by Catalin Marinas [4]: have enter() return some state and
the matching leave() take that state.
This is so totally the correct way.  Thanks.
Staring at this, I wonder if we could alternatively handle it like
pagefault_disable()/pagefault_enable(), having something like
current->lazy_mmu_enabled.

We wouldn't have to worry about preemption in that case I guess
(unless the arch has special requirements).

Not sure if that was already discussed, just a thought. 
That's an interesting point, I think I've addressed it in reply to patch
2 [1].

- Kevin

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/47ee1df7-1602-4200-af94-475f84ca8d80@arm.com/ (local)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help