Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Nesting support for lazy MMU mode
From: Kevin Brodsky <hidden>
Date: 2025-09-09 09:10:53
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mm, lkml, sparclinux, xen-devel
From: Kevin Brodsky <hidden>
Date: 2025-09-09 09:10:53
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mm, lkml, sparclinux, xen-devel
On 08/09/2025 18:56, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 08:39:24AM +0100, Kevin Brodsky wrote:quoted
When the lazy MMU mode was introduced eons ago, it wasn't made clear whether such a sequence was legal: arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode() ... arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode() ... arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode() ... arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode() It seems fair to say that nested calls to arch_{enter,leave}_lazy_mmu_mode() were not expected, and most architectures never explicitly supported it.This is compiling with CONFIG_USERFAULTFD at all commits and series is compiling with allmodconfig plus all mm selftests are passing so from my side this looks good, thanks for addressing issues and rebasing! :)
Great thank you for that extensive testing, very appreciated! Shall I add your Reviewed-by to the whole series? - Kevin