Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Nesting support for lazy MMU mode
From: David Hildenbrand <hidden>
Date: 2025-09-09 09:22:01
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mm, lkml, sparclinux, xen-devel
From: David Hildenbrand <hidden>
Date: 2025-09-09 09:22:01
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mm, lkml, sparclinux, xen-devel
On 09.09.25 04:16, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 08:39:24 +0100 Kevin Brodsky [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
The main change enabling nesting is patch 2, following the approach suggested by Catalin Marinas [4]: have enter() return some state and the matching leave() take that state.This is so totally the correct way. Thanks.
Staring at this, I wonder if we could alternatively handle it like pagefault_disable()/pagefault_enable(), having something like current->lazy_mmu_enabled. We wouldn't have to worry about preemption in that case I guess (unless the arch has special requirements). Not sure if that was already discussed, just a thought. -- Cheers David / dhildenb