Thread (39 messages) 39 messages, 9 authors, 2019-11-15

Re: [PATCH 00/50] Add log level to show_stack()

From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2019-11-13 20:04:09
Also in: linux-alpha, linux-riscv, linux-um

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 21:34:40 +0100
Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] wrote:
I suppose I'm surprised there are backtraces that are not important.
Either badness happened and it needs printing, or the user asked for it
and it needs printing.
Unfortunately that is the case. As my tests will fail if a backtrace is
detected.
Perhaps we should be removing backtraces if they're not important
instead of allowing to print them as lower loglevels?
I usually end up removing backtraces for my tests, so I'm for this.
Specifically this happens in the drm and i915 drivers :-p

-- Steve
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help