Re: [PATCH 00/50] Add log level to show_stack()
From: Dmitry Safonov <hidden>
Date: 2019-11-09 01:31:14
Also in:
linux-alpha, linux-riscv, linux-um
On 11/8/19 5:30 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 04:28:30PM +0000, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
[..]
quoted
Well, the use-case for lower log-level is that everything goes into logs (/var/log/dmesg or /var/log/messages whatever rsyslog has settting). That has it's value: - after a failure (i.e. panic) messages, those were only signs that something goes wrong can be seen in logs which can give ideas what has happened.No they don't. When the kernel panics, userspace generally stops running, so rsyslog won't be able to write them to /var/log/messages. How, by "kernel panics" I mean a real kernel panic, which probably isn't what you're talking about there. You are probably talking about the whole shebang of non-fatal kernel oops, kernel warnings and the like. If so, I'd ask you to stop confuzzilating terminology. If you really want to capture such events, then you need to have the kernel write the panic to (e.g.) flash - see the mtdoops driver.
I was talking about things prior the panic: OOMs, MMC write/read
warnings, hung tasks, we also have local patches to produce a warning if
the mutex is being held for too long or a task is starving on CPU time
by hard/soft irqs (I hope I will design something like that for
upstream). I've found those warnings useful to:
(a) have an early message when the things are starting going bad.
(b) analyze contentions or too large scale for a box or faulty hardware
for non-reproducible issues just from logs.
We use kexec to save the dmesg ringbuffer content after the panic.
Thanks,
Dmitry